Pros and Cons of Pre-Settlement Funding for Plaintiffs: An In-Depth Analysis

Pre-settlement funding, or litigation financing, has gained popularity as a financial option for plaintiffs involved in legal disputes. This funding can provide much-needed monetary support for those struggling with expenses while their case is pending. In this article, we will delve into the pros and cons of pre-settlement funding, offering insights and information to help plaintiffs make well-informed decisions.

Understanding Pre-Settlement Funding

Pre-settlement funding is a cash advance provided by a third-party company to plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit. This advance, usually a percentage of the expected settlement amount, is intended to help plaintiffs cover living expenses, medical bills, and other costs during the litigation process.

Pros of Pre-Settlement Funding for Plaintiffs

  • Financial Relief: One of the main benefits of pre-settlement funding is the financial relief it offers to plaintiffs. They can use the funds to cover expenses like rent, utilities, and medical bills, easing their financial burden while they await their case’s resolution.
  • No Credit Checks or Collateral: Unlike traditional loans, pre-settlement funding does not require credit checks or collateral. This means that plaintiffs with poor credit scores or limited assets can still qualify for funding.
  • Non-Recourse Funding: Pre-settlement funding is non-recourse in nature, meaning that if the plaintiff loses their case, they are not obligated to repay the advance. This reduces the financial risk for plaintiffs.
  • Empowerment in Negotiations: Pre-settlement funding can provide plaintiffs with more leverage during settlement negotiations. With their immediate financial needs met, plaintiffs may be less likely to accept lowball settlement offers out of desperation.

Cons of Pre-Settlement Funding for Plaintiffs

  • High Interest Rates: A significant drawback of pre-settlement funding is the potentially high interest rates attached to these advances. Funding companies often charge higher rates to compensate for the risk they assume in providing funds to plaintiffs.
  • Impact on Settlement Amount: Accepting pre-settlement funding can sometimes reduce a plaintiff’s overall settlement amount. This is because the funding company takes a portion of the settlement for repayment of the advance, along with accrued interest and fees.
  • Complicated Terms and Fees: Some pre-settlement funding agreements may include complex terms and fees, making it difficult for plaintiffs to fully understand their obligations. This could lead to unforeseen costs and complications.

Evaluating Pre-Settlement Funding: Key Considerations

  • Assessing Financial Needs: Before pursuing pre-settlement funding, plaintiffs should carefully assess their financial needs and determine if they can manage without the advance. If the funds are necessary, it is essential to borrow only what is needed to cover immediate expenses.
  • Comparing Funding Companies: It is crucial to research and compare multiple pre-settlement funding companies. Look for those with transparent fee structures, competitive interest rates, and a strong reputation for ethical practices.
  • Consulting with Legal Counsel: Plaintiffs should always consult with their attorney before applying for pre-settlement funding. An attorney can provide valuable insights into the process, potential impacts on the case, and help select the best funding company.
  • Reading the Fine Print: Before signing any funding agreement, plaintiffs should carefully review the terms, fees, and repayment obligations. If anything is unclear, seek clarification from the funding company or consult with an attorney.

Alternatives to Pre-Settlement Funding

Before opting for pre-settlement funding, plaintiffs should explore other financial options that may be available to them:

  • Personal Loans: Plaintiffs with good credit may be eligible for personal loans from banks or credit unions. These loans typically have lower interest rates than pre-settlement funding and can be used to cover expenses during the litigation process.
  • Credit Cards: If used responsibly, credit cards can be a short-term solution to cover necessary expenses. However, plaintiffs should be cautious of high interest rates and the potential for debt accumulation.
  • Borrowing from Friends or Family: Borrowing money from friends or family members can be a viable alternative to pre-settlement funding. This option usually comes with more favorable repayment terms and lower interest rates, if any.
  • Payment Plans and Assistance Programs: Plaintiffs can explore payment plans or financial assistance programs for medical bills and other expenses. Many hospitals and service providers offer flexible payment options or reduced fees for those facing financial hardships.


Pre-settlement funding can be a valuable financial tool for plaintiffs facing monetary challenges during the litigation process. However, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons of this funding option before making a decision. By assessing their financial needs, comparing funding companies, and considering alternatives, plaintiffs can make well-informed choices that align with their best interests. Consultation with an attorney is always recommended to ensure a thorough understanding of the potential impact of pre-settlement funding on the case and to navigate the complexities of the funding process.